In my prior post I told how well-known Humanist Bart Campolo pressed me on the question of how a nonChristian spouse could live with the indignity of being thought “worthy of hell” by a Christian spouse. I have to admit, I’d never thought of the situation that way before. I said to Bart that I personally wouldn’t be insulted if …
Notepad Apologetics, Short Lesson #6: Secular Humanism (part 3), My Critique
In my prior post I offered an affirmation and two brief explanations (from a Christian perspective) of Humanism. In this post I offer some observations that are more critical. Again, the claim of Humanists is that we can be good without God . . . And in fact we’re doing just that. Just watch us . . . So if I …
Notepad Apologetics, Short Lesson #6: Secular Humanism (part 4), My Meeting with Bart Campolo
This is the fourth installment in my series on Secular Humanism (or simply Humanism), inside the larger series of “Notepad Apologetics.” My prior post offered four critiques of Humanism. Theorizing about these matters is one thing but live interaction with a true Humanist is another. I met well-known Humanist Bart Campolo recently at the University of Cincinnati, where he serves as …
Notepad Apologetics, Short Lesson #6: Secular Humanism (part 2), My Responses
In my prior post, I asked how Christians should respond to the claim of Secular Humanism, embedded in the title of the popular book, Good Without God, by Harvard/MIT Humanist Chaplain Greg Epstein. In the book Epstein names some famous figures who he claims were fellow Humanists, including Thomas Jefferson, Winston Churchill, Jean-Paul Sartre, and John Lennon. What they all …
Notepad Apologetics, Short Lesson #5 (part 3): Slavery and the Bible
In my last post I presented the idea of God as a gradualist. He works on social reforms incrementally — at the speed of humanity rather than the speed of divinity. The incarnation is the ultimate example of God “walking at our pace.” This post is about God’s work on the problem of slavery. Main Point: The Bible shows forward progress …
Notepad Apologetics, Short Lesson #5 (part 2): God the Gradualist
In my prior post I mentioned that God is generally a gradualist, aside from a few big-ticket items such as performing instantaneous miracles. What do I mean by “gradualist”? Just this: God works on major human problems and institutions a little at a time. He doesn’t simply snap his fingers or wave his wand to make everything okay. God could …
Notepad Apologetics, Short Lesson #5 (part 1): What about Slavery and Polygamy?
Recently at the University of Michigan, a grad student in a Stump the Chump* session asked me why the Bible condones practices we no longer consider ethical, such as slavery and polygamy. My answer to this and similar questions about aberrant practices in the Bible (divorce, rape, looting, concubinage, etc.) usually boils down to this: God is not in the …
Notepad Apologetics, Short Lesson #4: Must We Prove God (part 3)?
This is part three of the “Must We Prove God?” posts, inside the larger series of Notepad Apologetics. After taking a slight detour in my last post to the relation of God and science, I wish to return to the original question: Must we prove God to justify belief in God? The short answer is no. Christian philosophers have taken two main …
Notepad Apologetics, Short Lesson #4: Must We Prove God (part 1)?
This fourth in a series of “notepad” posts is my attempt to navigate quickly to the heart of an issue in apologetics. Question: Must we prove God to justify our belief in him? Two common responses from Christians: “Yes, of course. Even though I can’t provide such proof I’m sure other Christians smarter than me have done so. I’ll trust …
Notepad Apologetics, Short Lesson #4: Must We Prove God (part 2)?
In my prior post I told of meeting up with Larry the science professor for lunch one day, and how he pressed the point on me of the superiority of science over religion in discovering truth and acquiring knowledge. As an atheist, Larry’s point was clear: God as an explanation is not only inferior to science, God is not needed …