Invitation Part 6: Bible Corruption?

Rick Mattson Apologetics, Bible, Uncategorized Leave a Comment

The Telephone Game  

One of the objections I hear on college campuses about the Bible is that it’s been corrupted over the centuries due to copy and translation errors.

An analogy often used is the telephone game: A group of people whisper a certain phrase around a circle, corrupting the phrase further with each succeeding “transmission,” the end result sounding markedly different than the original.

Thus, “I ate toast this morning” might turn into, “I hate the coast and I’m in mourning,” by the tenth person or so.

Critics point out that the Bible isn’t a circle of just ten transmissions, but hundreds, and not composed of only a single phrase, but thousands — often copied in low-light conditions by unskilled labor.

Hardly a recipe for accuracy and reliability.

In fact, it’s been estimated that there are some 400,000 “variants” (mistakes) in the ancient texts.

Three Replies: Lay people are generally unaware of the following facts, however:

1. Minor errors: 99% of the variants are minuscule, such as spelings of cities, and obvious omissions and and additions.

2. Multiple games: Scholars are not limited to studying one telephone game. Rather, there are multiple “games” to be pored over: manuscript “families” or “traditions” from diverse locations in the Mediterranean world that can be compared with each other. This process of cross-comparison leads many scholars to believe we’ve recovered more than 97% of the original wording of the New Testament.*

3.  Unaffected doctrine: No central doctrines of faith are affected by unresolved manuscript variants.

There is much more to be said on this topic.

Minimally, my hope in this short post is to give you some confidence that the charge of “Bible corruption,” often heard in the media, pop culture (and on college campuses), isn’t true.

New Testament historian Bart Ehrman, who makes no claim to Christian faith, seems to agree:

[Textual] variants . . . do not detract from the integrity of the New Testament; they simply provide the data that scholars need to work on to establish the text, a text that is more amply documented than any other from the ancient world.**

* For an excellent overview of how scholars study early manuscripts, see Timothy Paul Jones, Misquoting Truth, esp. ch 2.
** See Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus, ch 3 (Kindle location 1412).
photo credit from

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *