• Home
  • About Me
  • Blog
    • Apologetics
    • Atheism
    • Bible
    • Devotion
    • Church
    • Evangelism
    • Hiddenness of God
    • Leadership
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Pluralism
    • Science and Faith
    • Theology
  • My Books
  • Video
  • Talks
  • Invite Me
No Result
View All Result
Rick Mattson Outreach Ministry
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Blog
    • Apologetics
    • Atheism
    • Bible
    • Devotion
    • Church
    • Evangelism
    • Hiddenness of God
    • Leadership
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Pluralism
    • Science and Faith
    • Theology
  • My Books
  • Video
  • Talks
  • Invite Me
No Result
View All Result
Rick Mattson Outreach Ministry
No Result
View All Result

Bible Interpretation Part 3: The Pluralist Objection

October 13, 2017

In the prior two posts, I responded to the naturalistic and literalistic objections to Bible interpretation.

The “pluralist” objection is third, and goes something like this:

The Bible is just one revelation among many of the Divine. Any interpretation of the Bible that excludes other religious traditions or somehow invalidates them cannot be accepted.

Two Replies: 

1. Excluding exclusivism: the pluralist is actually claiming that the traditional interpretation of the Bible — that, for example, Jesus Christ is the only true pathway to God — going back 2,000 years to the early church, is false.

Think about that. Billions of Christians throughout history have held to the traditional view, and the pluralist is “excluding” them by saying their view is wrong.

2. How do you know? I like to ask the pluralist how she knows the divine has been revealed in a plurality of traditions — such as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc.

The pluralist might respond, “It only makes sense that God wouldn’t reveal himself in just one tradition” — to which I say, Why not? How do you know God so well?

I also might ask how all these religious views can be valid if they contradict each other (which they do).

* * * * *

I find it useful to press the pluralist for a basis of his accusations against traditional Christianity. Often, the pluralist responds with something about “justice.” It’s only just, so says the pluralist, that God would not “exclude” any religions, but would include everyone.

I’ll respond to this notion of justice in my next post.

For a more in-depth analysis of the pluralist objection, see chapter 9 of my Faith is Like Skydiving: And Other Memorable Images for Dialogue with Seekers and Skeptics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share120Tweet75
Rick Mattson

Rick Mattson

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About Me

Rick Mattson Outreach Ministry

Rick Mattson

Evangelist & Writer

Hello & welcome to my blog! My name is Rick Mattson and I'm a traveling evangelist/apologist.

SUBSCRIBE! You'll be notified by email whenever a new post comes out
Loading

Categories

  • Apologetics (155)
  • Atheism (47)
  • Bible (33)
  • Church (71)
  • Devotion (102)
  • Evangelism (56)
  • Hiddenness of God (9)
  • Leadership (65)
  • Philosophy (7)
  • Religious Pluralism (14)
  • Science and Faith (3)
  • Theology (2)

Popular

  • A Gen Z Additive, Part 1 of 3: Who is Gen Z?

    A Gen Z Additive, Part 1 of 3: Who is Gen Z?

    342 shares
    Share 137 Tweet 86
  • Apologetics for Kids, Part 1 of 2

    336 shares
    Share 134 Tweet 84
  • Tradition as a Guardrail

    327 shares
    Share 131 Tweet 82
  • Apologetics for Kids, Part 2

    321 shares
    Share 128 Tweet 80
  • Muslim Dialogue

    314 shares
    Share 126 Tweet 79
Facebook Twitter

© 2022 Site by 5BCreative

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Blog
    • Apologetics
    • Atheism
    • Bible
    • Devotion
    • Church
    • Evangelism
    • Hiddenness of God
    • Leadership
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Pluralism
    • Science and Faith
    • Theology
  • My Books
  • Video
  • Talks
  • Invite Me