• Home
  • About Me
  • Blog
    • Apologetics
    • Atheism
    • Bible
    • Devotion
    • Church
    • Evangelism
    • Hiddenness of God
    • Leadership
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Pluralism
    • Science and Faith
    • Theology
  • My Books
  • Video
  • Talks
  • Invite Me
No Result
View All Result
Rick Mattson Outreach Ministry
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Blog
    • Apologetics
    • Atheism
    • Bible
    • Devotion
    • Church
    • Evangelism
    • Hiddenness of God
    • Leadership
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Pluralism
    • Science and Faith
    • Theology
  • My Books
  • Video
  • Talks
  • Invite Me
No Result
View All Result
Rick Mattson Outreach Ministry
No Result
View All Result

Exclusivism Part 1: The Label Nobody Wants

December 10, 2018

I am what’s sometimes called a traditional or “historic” Christian. It means I’m trying to stand in a line that stretches back to the Reformation, to the early church, to the twelve Apostles, and to Jesus himself.*

One of the main beliefs of historic Christians such as myself is that the Apostles and early church were in a unique position to assess the life of Jesus and to either debunk his claim to be the Son of God, or promote it. They chose the latter (mainly because of the resurrection) — and were martyred for doing so.

This stance of identifying with the early church carries with it an assertion that is very unpopular in contemporary American society (and elsewhere): that historic Christianity is true.

Honestly, this mantle can be a burden at times.

Whereas it’s acceptable in contemporary culture to say of oneself, “I’m religious,” or “I’m a Christian,” or “I choose X while others choose Y, and we’re all OK with that,” the claim to believe that a certain view is actually true (as I do) contains an additional unpopular corollary: every other competing claim is false. Atheism, for example, is false if historic Christianity is true.

Now a critic might object along these lines: 

Why can’t we all just get along?

Why can’t we work together toward a tolerant and just society that respects the views of all well-meaning persons? Hasn’t history taught us that such exclusive truth claims have often been the source of conflict, even war?

I’ll respond to the critic in my next post.

*In contemporary terms, I’m also an “evangelical” Christian. But that can mean a lot of things. I use the words “historic” or “traditional” Christian because those words point back in time to the beginning of the faith.

 

Support Rick and Sharon

(thanks)

Share120Tweet75
Rick Mattson

Rick Mattson

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About Me

Rick Mattson Outreach Ministry

Rick Mattson

Evangelist & Writer

Hello & welcome to my blog! My name is Rick Mattson and I'm a traveling evangelist/apologist.

SUBSCRIBE! You'll be notified by email whenever a new post comes out
Loading

Categories

  • Apologetics (152)
  • Atheism (47)
  • Bible (32)
  • Church (67)
  • Devotion (102)
  • Evangelism (52)
  • Hiddenness of God (9)
  • Leadership (65)
  • Philosophy (7)
  • Religious Pluralism (14)
  • Science and Faith (3)
  • Theology (1)

Popular

  • Apologetics for Kids

    Apologetics for Kids

    328 shares
    Share 131 Tweet 82
  • Tradition as a Guardrail

    326 shares
    Share 130 Tweet 82
  • Muslim Dialogue

    311 shares
    Share 124 Tweet 78
  • Objective Truth is Back

    306 shares
    Share 122 Tweet 77
  • What I’m Working On: Part 1 of 3: Inside-to-Out

    306 shares
    Share 122 Tweet 77
Facebook Twitter

© 2022 Site by 5BCreative

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Blog
    • Apologetics
    • Atheism
    • Bible
    • Devotion
    • Church
    • Evangelism
    • Hiddenness of God
    • Leadership
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Pluralism
    • Science and Faith
    • Theology
  • My Books
  • Video
  • Talks
  • Invite Me